<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manipulating Strings in C# -Replacing part of a string / Replacing all occurences of a sub-string</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dijksterhuis.org/manipulating-strings-in-csharp-replacing-part-string/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dijksterhuis.org/manipulating-strings-in-csharp-replacing-part-string/</link>
	<description>Information, news about programming in C#</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:48:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martijn</title>
		<link>http://www.dijksterhuis.org/manipulating-strings-in-csharp-replacing-part-string/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dijksterhuis.org/?p=637#comment-317</guid>
		<description>@Mike 

Thanks for the comment. Regular expressions are notoriously slow because of their complexity but they usually offer very good value as you can work miracles with just a few lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. Regular expressions are notoriously slow because of their complexity but they usually offer very good value as you can work miracles with just a few lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.dijksterhuis.org/manipulating-strings-in-csharp-replacing-part-string/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dijksterhuis.org/?p=637#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to let you know I came across your blog a few weeks ago, and have found your articles very informative.  I never knew that the two methods above would be so far apart performance wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to let you know I came across your blog a few weeks ago, and have found your articles very informative.  I never knew that the two methods above would be so far apart performance wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
